How We Prioritize Impact Matters
Today, there seems to be an ever-increasing number of social enterprises in operation. Despite the criticisms the movement may face in regards to some groups merely using causes as a marketing strategy instead of an authentic social mission (also known as “cause-washing”), it’s become clear that the overall awareness and interest in social enterprise has grown tremendously. In my view, we have moved beyond the notion that social good in business is a fad, and it’s solidified its presence in our markets and daily lives.
Some social enterprise leaders and practitioners may call this an oversimplification, but I’d like to suggest that there are really only two types of core models for social enterprise. This is one of the distinctions I like to look at when establishing the motives behind social good businesses. It doesn’t offer a complete picture, but I’ve found it to be telling nonetheless.
1) The Cause and Effect Model
Within this model, organizations and businesses seek to take a social impact action once a purchase — or some other exchange — is made. Often times this comes in the form of a “percentage of sale” charitable donation or the donation of a physical product. Most often people will think of TOMS shoes and their ‘buy one, give one’ approach to the shoes they sell, but there are hundreds (if not thousands) of companies who employ a similar strategy. This model could also be summarized as “Post Purchase Impact”.
2) The Impact Integrated Model
This model is identified by its inclusion of impact efforts within the core business activities or its supply chain. These organizations are integrating social impact into their work prior to the sale of their product or service. I like to say these groups are “leading with impact” then inviting customers to take part. Examples of this type of model are the Goodwill thrift stores or The Giving Keys, as a more modern example. Contrarily, this model could be summarized as “Pre Purchase Impact”.
I believe there is a place for both impact models and that both are needed to be implemented in order to aid in the wide range of social, environmental and cultural ills our world faces. Additionally, these models are not mutually exclusive. They can happen in tandem.
However, I would advocate for everyone to consider ways to implement the Impact Integrated Model and what we as shoppers should be rewarding. An integrated, or pre-purchase impact, approach shows a commitment to a clear mission prior to the final step of making a sale.
I must mention, that I do not have an unbiased view on this, as this has been the approach of my work in establishing Krochet Kids intl. and KNOWN SUPPLY — apparel and accessories brands focused on employing vulnerable women to produce all of our goods. That being said, I can share from my experience and mention these closing thoughts on models for social enterprise:
- The work is never done. The social issues we are facing and the demands of growing a profitable business create an extremely complex combination of factors. Look for groups who are committed to improving more than those who say they have it all figured out.
- Authenticity is key. Get to know the backstory of the brand and understand not only what motivated them to begin addressing a specific social issue, but understand how they keep their aim for impact front and center.
Kohl this is so good. You put words to something that’s been rattling around in my head. I’ll definitely be sharing this with others. Thanks for writing!
Thanks Molly. In a movement that (by all measures) is in its early phases, I find it helpful to break down some of the ways we overcomplicate methodologies to more simpler forms. Glad you liked it.
Kohl – This piece keeps drawing me back in (specifically the pre-purchase impact and post-purchase impact concepts). Agree that the “impact integrated model” will win out over time. Thank you for putting your ideas out there!
Thank you Elena for your response. It makes me happy to here that this piece speaks to you!
Hi Kohl,
I am interested in your thoughts on this film’s topic.
https://youtu.be/K30FyqWkWsU
Thanks for sharing. While I still need to see the entire film, I agree wholeheartedly with the premise in the trailer. It’s best summed up as “emergency disaster relief has become the model”. That was what I saw and experienced in my early travels and my work has sought to fight against. The only truly sustainable way forward for people breaking the cycle of poverty is to become equipped with the tools, resources and knowledge they need to live self-reliant livelihoods. That’s why I lean toward “pre-purchase impact” in this article, because in my experience I have witnessed that focus on empowerment and less on handouts (like a post-purchase buy one, give one model).